The man is utter scum. Killing thousands of innocent people?
But the reason he can say it with ANY credibility at all is that the USA emits, on a per person basis, far more CO2 than any other country.
Which is actually a key on one excellent strategy for reducing global warming, one that would also make a significant difference in fighting terrorists. The USA could develop advanced technology to use energy more efficiently. It’s a powerful strategy that could be deployed relatively rapidly.
And, as a fringe benefit, the technology would be copied by other countries, lower the price of oil, and help keep petrodictators from funding terrorists. One veteran of the Iraq war came home and started a biodiesel company, because he was distressed that automobile drivers were basically paying for the bombs that killed his buddies.
"the Number One wanted man in the entire (Western) world can speak credibly because what he is saying is correct (about AGW)? Do I have that right?"
No, you don’t have it right. He’s not credible about anything. But neither is global warming science less credible because he (or anyone) supports it. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
He’s using the credibility of global warming to attack the USA. And at the same time illuminating a clear way to reduce the effectiveness of terrorism, by reducing the use of oil.
And, by the way, oil is a world market, with a world price. When the USA buys oil from Canada, it supports the high price, and puts more money in the hands of the Ayatollahs. That’s not a good thing.
Mail this post
Technorati Tags: automobile drivers, ayatollahs, Bin Laden, biodiesel, bombs, buddies, canada, clock, credibility, Fight Terrorism, fringe benefit, Global Warming, global warming science, iraq war, Money, person basis, price of oil, Scum, terrorism, terrorists, veteran, World 99, world market